The Decameron (Day 1 to Day 5) Containing an hundred pleasant Novels — Reading Companion

(0 User reviews)   612
Boccaccio, Giovanni, 1313-1375, Florio, John, 1553?-1625 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2016 Not confirmed
Plague -- Europe -- History -- Fiction; Storytelling -- Fiction; Allegories; Frame stories Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 204,128
Reading time 888 min
Text sections 17

Before opening The Decameron (Day 1 to Day 5) Containing an hundred pleasant Novels — Reading Companion, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 204,128 words, 14 hr 48 min estimated reading time, and 17 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 41.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Plague -- Europe -- History -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This edition of Boccaccio's Decameron (Days 1–5) in John Florio's 1620 translation presents the frame story of ten storytellers fleeing plague-ravaged Florence. The excerpts reveal a structure of nested narratives, recurring motifs of deception and moral ambiguity, and vivid shifts between comic and tragic registers.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

here was one named, _Musciatto Francesi_, who from beeing a most rich and great merchant in _France_, was become a Knight, and preparing to go into _Tuscany_, with Monsieur _Charles without Land_, Brother to the King of _France_ (who was desired and incited to come thither by Pope _Boniface_) found his affaires greatly intricated here and there (as oftentimes the matters of Merchants fall out to bee) and that very hardly hee should sodainly unintangle them, without referring the charge of them to divers persons. And for all he tooke indifferent good order, onely he remained doubtfull, whom he might sufficiently leave, to recover his debts among many _Burgundians_. And the rather was his care the more herein, because he knew the _Burgundians_ to be people of badde nature, rioters, brablers, full of calumny, and without any faithfulnesse; so that he could not bethinke himselfe of any man (how wicked soever he was) in whom he might repose trust to meete with their lewdnesse. Having a long while examined his thoughts upon this point, at last hee remembred one master _Chappelet du Prat_, who ofttimes had resorted to his house in _Paris_. And because he was a man of little stature, yet handsome enough, the French not knowing what this word _Chappelet_ might mean, esteeming he should be called rather (in their tongue) _Chappell_; imagined, that in regard of his small stature, they termed him _Chappelet_, and not _Chappell_, and so by the name of _Chappelet_ he was every where known, and by few or none acknowledged for _Chappel_.

This master _Chappelet_, was of so good and commendable life; that, being a Notarie, he held it in high disdaine, that any of his Contractes (although he made but few) should be found without falshoode. And looke how many soever hee dealt withall, he would be urged and required thereto, offering them his paines and travaile for nothing, but to be requited otherwise then by money; which prooved to bee his much larger recompencing, and returned to him the farre greater benefit. Hee tooke the onely pleasure of the world, to beare false witnesse, if hee were thereto entreated, and (oftentimes) when hee was not requested at all. Likewise, because in those times, great trust and beleefe was given to an oath, he making no care or conscience to be perjured: greatly advantaged himselfe by Law suites, in regard that many matters relyed upon his oath, and delivering the truth according to his knowledge.

He delighted (beyond measure) and addicted his best studies, to cause enmities & scandals between kindred and friends, or any other persons, agreeing well together; and the more mischiefe he could procure in this kind, so much the more pleasure and delight tooke he therein. If he were called to kil any one, or to do any other villanous deede, he never would make deniall, but go to it very willingly; and divers times it was wel knowen, that many were cruelly beaten, ye slaine by his hands. Hee was a most horrible blasphemer of God and his Saints, upon the very least occasion, as being more addicted to choller, then any other man could be. Never would he frequent the Church, but basely contemned it, with the Sacraments and religious rites therein administred, accounting them for vile and unprofitable things: but very voluntarily would visit Tavernes, and other places of dishonest accesse, which were continually pleasing unto him, to satisfie his lust and inordinate lubricitie. Hee would steale both in publike and private, even with such a conscience, as if it were given to him by nature so to do. He was a great glutton and a drunkarde, even till he was not able to take any more: being also a continuall gamester, and carrier of false Dice, to cheate with them the verie best Friendes he had.

But why do I waste time in such extent of words? When it may suffice to say, that never was there a worse man borne; whose wickednesse was for long time supported, by the favour, power, and Authoritie of Monsieur _Musciatto_, for whose sake many wrongs and injuries were patiently endured, as well by private persons (whom hee would abuse notoriously) as others of the Court, betweene whom he made no difference at all in his vile dealing. This Master _Chappelet_, being thus remembred by _Musciatto_ (who very well knew his life and behaviour) he perfectly perswaded himselfe, that this was a man apt in all respects, to meete with the treachery of the Burgundians: whereupon, having sent for him, thus he beganne.

John Florio's 1620 translation of Boccaccio's Decameron (Days 1–5) opens with a dedicatory epistle that frames the work as a collection of 'singular and exquisite Histories' intended to reveal vice and virtue. The excerpts show a structure where ten young people—seven ladies and three gentlemen—retreat from plague-stricken Florence to tell tales over ten days. Each day has a theme, and the stories are embedded within a frame narrative that itself comments on storytelling and morality.

The translation retains the original's layered voices: the authorial preface, the narrators' debates, and the characters' speeches. Florio's English is ornate and rhythmic, with long sentences and rhetorical flourishes that mirror Boccaccio's Italian prose. The excerpts include a tale of seduction and remorse, where Ricciardo's cunning and Catulla's shame lead to mutual destruction, illustrating the work's recurring interest in the consequences of desire and deception.

Frame and Embedded Narratives

The Decameron employs a frame story that is not merely a container but an active part of the work's meaning. The ten storytellers are introduced in the epistle as 'seaven Honourable Ladies, and three Noble Gentlemen' who flee the plague. Their conversations between tales create a second layer of commentary. In the excerpts, the frame is established through the dedicatory epistle, which argues that reading histories teaches wisdom by 'resorting to the dead.' This meta-note sets up the tales as instructive examples.

The structure is recursive: within a tale, characters often tell stories themselves, or their actions mirror the themes of the frame. For instance, Ricciardo's manipulation of Catulla echoes the storytellers' own rhetorical skills. The frame also provides relief from the plague's horror, as the company's garden setting contrasts with the city's decay. This nesting of narratives allows Boccaccio to explore multiple perspectives on love, fortune, and wit without a single authorial judgment.

Recurring Images of Confinement and Escape

Throughout the excerpts, physical and psychological confinement recurs. The plague confines the city's inhabitants to death; the storytellers voluntarily confine themselves to a rural villa. Within tales, characters are trapped in baths, bedrooms, or marriages. In the Ricciardo and Catulla story, the lady is 'leapt out of the Bath' but cannot escape, and later she 'recovered her owne house' only to be imprisoned by remorse. The bath itself is a confined space where deception occurs.

Escape is often illusory or leads to further entrapment. Catulla's flight from Ricciardo results in a 'fierce melancholy' that kills her. The pilgrim Thebaldo, mentioned in another excerpt, returns in disguise, suggesting that identity and freedom are fluid. These images of confinement—plague, bath, house, melancholy—create a pattern where characters' attempts to break free often tighten the bonds. The frame story's escape from plague is temporary, as the tales themselves return to themes of entrapment.

Movement Between Scenes and Registers

The excerpts show rapid shifts in setting and tone. The dedicatory epistle is formal and philosophical, citing Zeno and King Ptolemy. Then the narrative moves to the plague's horrors (implied), then to a garden of storytelling, then into a tale that begins with seduction and ends with death. Within the Ricciardo tale, the scene moves from a public street to a private bath, then to Catulla's house, and finally to a wilderness hermitage. Each shift changes the register: from witty dialogue to tearful persuasion to tragic outcome.

Boccaccio often juxtaposes comic and serious moments. Ricciardo's initial trick is almost farcical, but his tears and Catulla's 'tormenting passions' turn it tragic. The storytellers themselves move between laughter and moral reflection. This constant motion prevents any single mood from dominating, reflecting the work's claim to represent 'all Vices in their ugly deformities' and 'sacred Vertues.' The reader is carried along these shifts, never settling into one perspective.

Voice and Rhetoric in Florio's Translation

John Florio's translation gives the Decameron a distinctive English voice. His sentences are long and periodic, with clauses piled up: 'The Philosopher Zeno (Right Honourable, and my most worthily esteemed Lord) being demaunded on a time by what meanes a man might attaine to happinesse; made answere...' This Latinate syntax suits the epistle's formal tone. In the tales, however, dialogue becomes more direct. Ricciardo's speech uses rhetorical questions and parallel structures: 'what is done, cannot now be undone' and 'you are not the first, neither can be the last.'

Florio also employs vivid physical details: 'teares streaming aboundantly downe his cheekes' and 'shee would have leapt out of the Bath.' The translation preserves Boccaccio's balance between abstract moralizing and concrete action. The narrator's voice in the frame is measured, while characters speak with passion. This variety in register—from the epistle's gravity to the tale's urgency—demonstrates Florio's skill in rendering Boccaccio's stylistic range. Readers attentive to language will note how the translation shapes the work's emotional impact.

This edition of the first five days offers a substantial portion of Boccaccio's masterpiece in a historical translation that itself rewards study. Readers may wish to attend to how the frame story's progress—each day with its own king or queen—organizes the tales and how the narrators' personalities emerge through their choices. The interplay between the plague's reality and the garden's artifice remains a central tension, reminding us that storytelling is both an escape and a confrontation with human nature.

I keep thinking about how Boccaccio’s storytellers build worlds to escape their own fears, each tale a small shelter. That quiet urgency surfaced again in The Planet Mappers — Reading Companion, where mapping unknown places becomes its own kind of comfort. It stayed with me like a familiar voice, unhurried and strangely warm.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks